Skip to main content

Buxton v. State

Citations

  • 526 S.W.3d 666
  • 2017 WL 2872490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that article 38.37 was enacted as a statutory exception recognizing that children are often targeted for sex crimes in part because they tend to make poor witnesses and prosecutors otherwise must rely on largely uncorroborated testimony of a child victim
  • victim could not distinguish 5 between different incidents, but said that she was abused several times a week
  • “We conclude that, when considering the indictment and the various pretrial filings by the State together, as we are authorized to do, appellant received ample notice of the State’s theory of criminal liability such that he could prepare a defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higley, Keyes, Lloyd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.