Skip to main content

Bartlett v. State

Citations

  • 993 So. 2d 157
  • 2008 WL 4722492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was error to allow the detective to testify that he had ruled out the possibility that the defendant had acted in self-defense
  • holding that the state was unable to meet its burden to show harmless error when an officer gave opinion testimony as to the existence of self-defense
  • explaining “the mere fact that [a statute] required the investigator(s) to determine whether ‘there is probable cause that the force that was used was unlawful’ does not automatically bootstrap this information into admissible evidence”
  • witness testified to there being a substance that appeared to be blood on one of two knives
  • “Because the State has not met its burden under DiGuilio to show harmless error, we are constrained to REVERSE the conviction and sentence and REMAND for a new trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.