Bardin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a car manufacturer’s failure to mention that it used cheap steel rather than cast iron in its vehicles was not immoral
• stating that UCL “fraud” prong requires that members of the public are likely to be deceived by Page 15 – FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION the challenged conduct
• same, and asking California Legislature or Supreme Court to clarify standard
• discussing the split and the reasons for the split
• noting the split in authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).