In Re Firearm Cases

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting UCL claim where defendants “did not control the wrongful acts [in question] or encourage others to engage in questionable acts,” even though defendants did “have a relationship with the wrongdoers”
• A public nuisance “may be enjoined because harm is threatened that would be 28 1 significant if it occurred, and that would make the nuisance actionable under the rule 2 here stated, although no harm has yet resulted.”
• discussing the causation requirement for claims under the UCL

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).