Scripps Clinic v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs did not state a claim under the unfair prong where defendant medical center’s practice of not continuing to treat patients who sued the center did not affect plaintiffs’ constitutional right to redress in court
• requiring, under CelTech, that any UCL claim must be tethered to a legislatively declared policy
• UCL unfair prong claim “must be ‘tethered’ to specific constitutional, statutory or regulatory provisions.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).