California Court of Appeal· 4/19/2010
Durell v. Sharp Healthcare
Citations
- 183 Cal. App. 4th 1350
- 108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 682
- 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 531
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there was no reliance where “SAC [did] not allege [plaintiff] ever visited [defendant’s] Web site”
- concluding that complaint was properly dismissed where plaintiff did not allege that he \relied on any representation by\ the defendant
- holding that plaintiff's CLRA claim failed because plaintiff failed to allege facts showing that he “relied on any representation by” defendant
- denying that a separate claim for relief for unjust enrichment exists arising from allegations that a doctor billed unsubsidized rates to uninsured patients
- reasoning that a plaintiff’s “burden of pleading 1 causation in a UCL action should hinge on the nature of the alleged wrongdoing rather than 2 the specific prong of the UCL the consumer invokes”
- finding plaintiffs CLRA claim failed because plaintiff failed to allege facts showing that he “relied on any representation by” defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCONNELL
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2011-01-27· cited 891×
- Gary Davis v. Hsbc Bank Nevada, N.A.Ninth Circuit· 2012-08-31· cited 390×
- Skye Astiana v. the Hain Celestial GroupNinth Circuit· 2015-04-10· cited 357×
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2012-01-25· cited 163×
- Graham v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal· 2014-05-23· cited 144×
- Chapman v. Skype, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2013-10-04· cited 129×
- Amanda Sateriale v. R J Reynolds Tobacco CompanyNinth Circuit· 2012-07-13· cited 108×
- Esg Capital Partners v. Venable LLPNinth Circuit· 2016-07-11· cited 104×
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2012-07-19· cited 85×
- Williams Hicks v. Pga Tour, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2018-07-27· cited 80×
- John Doe v. Cvs Pharmacy, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2020-12-09· cited 78×
- In re iPhone Application Litig.N.D. California· 2012-06-12· cited 78×
- Aleksick v. 7-Eleven, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2012-05-08· cited 75×
- Veronica Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Ninth Circuit· 2012-12-26· cited 68×
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.N.D. California· 2018-03-05· cited 65×
- Graham-Sult v. ClainosNinth Circuit· 2013-12-27· cited 64×
- Low v. Linkedin Corp.N.D. California· 2012-07-12· cited 64×
- Hale v. Sharp HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-04-19· cited 58×
- Munoz v. MacMillanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-05-13· cited 57×
- Fraley v. Facebook, Inc.N.D. California· 2011-12-16· cited 52×
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2000-10-05· cited 1,654×
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court· 1999-04-08· cited 1,311×
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1995-08-28· cited 1,265×
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court· 2003-03-03· cited 855×
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 800×
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-06-25· cited 707×
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 705×
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1990-08-17· cited 465×
- McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2001-05-03· cited 361×
- Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-07-24· cited 250×
- Guthrey v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-05-11· cited 238×
- McBride v. BoughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-10-21· cited 209×
- Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-11-20· cited 198×
- Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2009-03-10· cited 197×
- McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2006-09-18· cited 164×
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-05-23· cited 159×
- CALIFORNIANS FOR DISAB. RIGHTS v. Mervyn'sCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-07-24· cited 150×
- Peterson v. Cellco PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-06-26· cited 144×
- Bardin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2006-02-23· cited 141×
- Melchior v. New Line Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2003-02-28· cited 130×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.