Durell v. Sharp Healthcare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no reliance where “SAC [did] not allege [plaintiff] ever visited [defendant’s] Web site”
• concluding that complaint was properly dismissed where plaintiff did not allege that he \relied on any representation by\ the defendant
• holding that plaintiff's CLRA claim failed because plaintiff failed to allege facts showing that he “relied on any representation by” defendant
• denying that a separate claim for relief for unjust enrichment exists arising from allegations that a doctor billed unsubsidized rates to uninsured patients
• reasoning that a plaintiff’s “burden of pleading 1 causation in a UCL action should hinge on the nature of the alleged wrongdoing rather than 2 the specific prong of the UCL the consumer invokes”
• finding plaintiffs CLRA claim failed because plaintiff failed to allege facts showing that he “relied on any representation by” defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).