Ayala v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that relocation to a smaller office and withdrawal of job responsibilities constitute discrete acts
• dismissing retaliation claims because “discrete discriminatory acts will be time-barred, and thus not actionable, even if they are related to acts alleged in timely filed charges.”
• “[T]ermination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, or refusal to hire are easily identifiable discrete acts instantaneously actionable.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[A]n individual wishing to initiate a complaint against a federal agency . . . must contact an EEO counselor within forty-five days of the alleged unlawful employment practice.”
• alleged adverse employment action triggers start of limitations period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).