· 1/30/2008
Franceschi v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Citations
- 514 F.3d 81
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 1964
- 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,104
- 102 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 883
- 2008 WL 240274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Although we have never expressly addressed this specific circumstance [ (i.e., failure to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to all of plaintiffs claims in the civil action
- “Title VII is a vehicle through which an individual may seek recovery for employment discrimination on the grounds of race, color, religion, gender, or national origin.”
- “[W]here . . . administrative remedies have not been exhausted with respect to any of the [] Title VII claims in the civil action, there is nothing properly before the court to which the retaliation claim may be bootstrapped.”
- describing Title VII as a means to redress employment discrimination
- “The employee may sue in federal court only if the EEOC dismisses the administrative charge, or if it does not bring civil suit or enter into a conciliation agreement within 180 days of the filing of the administrative charge.” (citing 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Baldock, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.