Morales-Tañon v. Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had failed to state a procedural due process claim because he had not alleged a property interest under state law in the opening of an application process for the president’s position
• noting that the ADA “does not limit its antidiscrimination 18 mandate to barriers that completely prohibit access”
• noting that the continuing violation doctrine “allow[s] suit to be delayed until a series of wrongful acts blossoms into an injury on which suit can be brought” (quoting Limestone Dev. Corp. v. Vill. of Lemont, 520 F.3d 797, 801 (7th Cir. 2008))
• plaintiff’s factual allegations must be sufficient to “raise a right [to] relief above the speculative level”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).