Litz v. Saint Consulting Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the reasonable relationship test does not apply to highly compensated employees and citing Anani
• agreeing with Anani and noting that the plaintiffs “sensibly abandoned” the argument that the reasonable relation provision [§ 541.604] “applies to highly compensated employees”
• employees were “guaranteed a minimum weekly salary of $1,000 whether they bill[ed] any hours or not”
• employees were “guaranteed a minimum weekly salary of $1,000 whether they bill[ed] any hours or not”
• adopting the Anani court’s analysis of the two regulations
• granting summary judgment because no practice of improper reductions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).