Roman-Martinez v. Runyon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee’s failure to contact an EEOC counselor within the proscribed statute of limitations results in losing his right to later pursue an action in court
• holding that an employee’s failure to contact an EEOC counselor within the proscribed statute of limitations results in losing his right to later pursue an action in court
• explaining that failure to timely initiate contact with an EEO counselor entails waiver of court review
• noting that, although the plaintiff initially filed an administrative complaint alleging violation of the Rehabilitation Act, the civil suit at issue was brought under Title VII alone
• noting that, although the plaintiff initially filed an administrative complaint alleging violation of the Rehabilitation Act, the civil suit at issue was brought under Title VII alone
• \To hold otherwise would allow appellant to circumvent the exhaustion requirement ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).