Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
First Circuit· 11/18/1996

Roman-Martinez v. Runyon

Citations

  • 100 F.3d 213
  • 6 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 138
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29752
  • 1996 WL 656367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employee’s failure to contact an EEOC counselor within the proscribed statute of limitations results in losing his right to later pursue an action in court
  • holding that an employee’s failure to contact an EEOC counselor within the proscribed statute of limitations results in losing his right to later pursue an action in court
  • explaining that failure to timely initiate contact with an EEO counselor entails waiver of court review
  • noting that, although the plaintiff initially filed an administrative complaint alleging violation of the Rehabilitation Act, the civil suit at issue was brought under Title VII alone
  • noting that, although the plaintiff initially filed an administrative complaint alleging violation of the Rehabilitation Act, the civil suit at issue was brought under Title VII alone
  • \To hold otherwise would allow appellant to circumvent the exhaustion requirement ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Campbell, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Roman-Martinez v. Runyon

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.