Malone v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “Plaintiffs’ sanitized version of the incident cannot control on 20 summary judgment when the record as a whole does not support that version.”
• refusing to apply the continuing Mulet, 582 F.Supp.3d 5 at 16 n.9 (D.P.R. 2022) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Gorelik v. Costin, 605 F.3d 118 (1st Cir. 2010) (applying the continuous violation doctrine to a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim
• “Arguments made in passing and not supported by 24 citations to the record or to case authority are generally deemed waived”
• without causal link between whistleblowing and some adverse employment action, claim fails as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).