Velazquez-Ortiz v. Vilsack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had properly exhausted administrative remedies regarding her retaliation claim by filing a second EEOC charge based on events that occurred after the filing of plaintiff's first EEOC charge
• finding that plaintiff had properly exhausted administrative remedies regarding her retaliation claim by filing a second EEOC complaint based on events that occurred after the filing of plaintiffs first EEOC complaint
• dismissing claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies when plaintiff referenced time-barred claims and failed to clarify multiple bases for EEOC complaint
• requiring, under Title VII, that the plaintiff show \that the [adverse employment] action was causally - 22 - linked to her involvement in the protected activity\
• affirming dismissal of Title VII claim where plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies
• “The fact that a complainant has filed an EEO complaint does not open the courthouse door to all claims of discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).