District of Columbia· 3/30/2013
Augustus v. Locke
Citations
- 934 F. Supp. 2d 220
- 2013 WL 1290839
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46041
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that employer’s requirement that plaintiff sit at her desk from 7:45 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. every day did not amount to an adverse employment action
- holding that plaintiff’s allegations that her employer questioned certain of her duties and “remind[ed] her that she was on the pay for performance plan did not affect the terms or conditions of her employment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Warner v. Vance-CooksDistrict of Columbia· 2013-07-25· cited 31×
- Richardson v. PetasisDistrict of Columbia· 2015-12-07· cited 29×
- Arnold v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2013-12-23· cited 5×
- Jouanny v. Embassy of France in the United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2017-11-21· cited 4×
- Tennant v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2023-08-09
- Wilson v. MayorkasDistrict of Columbia· 2025-04-03
- Robb v. VilsackDistrict of Columbia· 2025-06-04
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. R&R Janitorial Painting and Building Services, Inc.District of Columbia· 2025-08-20
- Earle v. United States Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict of Columbia· 2026-05-08
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-11-09· cited 8,430×
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 7,269×
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 6,226×
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 4,775×
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 3,700×
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court· 2001-04-23· cited 3,456×
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsD.C. Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 1,336×
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterD.C. Circuit· 1998-10-09· cited 1,302×
- Baloch v. KempthorneD.C. Circuit· 2008-12-30· cited 1,027×
- Jones v. BernankeD.C. Circuit· 2009-03-06· cited 725×
- George, Diane v. Leavitt, MichaelD.C. Circuit· 2005-05-17· cited 620×
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2002-08-13· cited 605×
- Forkkio, Samuel E. v. Powell, DonaldD.C. Circuit· 2002-10-18· cited 452×
- Gary Hamilton v. Timothy GeithnerD.C. Circuit· 2012-01-17· cited 438×
- Taylor, Carolyn v. Small, Lawrence M.D.C. Circuit· 2003-12-12· cited 422×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.