Richardson v. Petasis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the D.C. Court of Appeals has recognized that partners of a law firm “could be held individually liable under the DCHRA for both direct violations of the statute as ‘employers’ and for aiding and abetting the law firm’s discrimination”
• denying summary judgment where a reasonable employee could have “interpret[ed] [the] employer’s actions as ‘a sign of imminent termination’ and as an indication that [the employer] no longer wanted her to remain an employee”
• placement on paid administrative leave constitutes an adverse employment action where the express terms of employee’s leave resulted in termination of employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).