Augusta Clark v. Tarrant County, Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a county probation department was an arm of the state even though it generated revenue through probation fees
• explaining that an amended complaint entirely supersedes and takes the place of an original complaint
• noting that an amended complaint entirely supersedes and takes the place of an original pleading, rendering the original complaint of no legal effect
• finding that an amended complaint entirely supersedes and takes the place of an original pleading, rendering the original complaint of no legal effect
• finding that a county probation department was an arm of the state even though it generated revenue through probation fees
• holding that sufficient notice had been given to the nonmovant when the court held a hearing, at which the court accepted evidence outside the pleadings, and there was ample time after the hearing for the parties to submit additional evidence to the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).