Skip to main content
· 3/3/1982

Cecil JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 669 F.2d 280
  • 29 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1117
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21307
  • 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]he underlying purpose of the fourth element in the McDonnell Douglas formulation is precisely to establish this unlawful inference of discrimination”
  • noting that “[t]he underlying purpose of the fourth element in the McDonnell Douglas formulation is precisely to establish this unlawful inference of discrimination”
  • noting that “[t]he underlying purpose of the fourth element in the McDonnell Douglas formulation is precisely to establish this unlawful inference of discrimination”
  • motion for reexamination of an order disposing of an action prior to trial was presumed to be a motion for reconsideration rather than a motion for new trial
  • court notes that prima facie case of discrimination in discharge may exist even where plaintiff is replaced by minority, since replacement by another minority may be a pretextual device designed to disguise the act of discrimination.
  • “Although the parties and the district court all proceeded to deal with plaintiff's motion as one for “new trial,” neither the parties nor the court identified whether it was a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(a)(2) or Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). As this was a motion 2002

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Gee, Reavley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.