Daniel M. Perez v. Region 20 Education Service Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Eleventh Amendment immunity barred the plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief under the ADA
• holding that service centers are entitled to sovereign immunity because “they serve as administrative divisions of the unitary state educational system’’
• finding that the Fifth Circuit has “long recognized that Congress has clearly abrogated the states’ Eleventh Amendment immunity in enacting Title VII”
• finding that the Fifth Circuit has “long recognized that Congress has clearly abrogated the states’ Eleventh Amendment immunity in enacting Title VII”
• providing that “[t]he district court properly concluded that Eleventh Amendment immunity bars [the plaintiff’s claim]. Thus, we need not reach the merits of this claim.”
• noting that although a “section of the Texas Labor Code,” Tex. Lab. Code Ann. §§ 21.002(8)(D), 21.002(14)(A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).