PYCA Industries, Inc. v. Harrison County Waste Water Management District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court’s denial of motion to amend answer to add claims was not a final order that could be certified for interlocutory appeal
• holding that the district court abused its discretion by certifying an appeal without a finding of hardship
• determining that district court’s denial of motion for leave to amend is not final for purposes of rule 54(b)
• providing that a motion to amend is nondispositive in the context of Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) certification
• intentional interference claim based on insured's assertion of contractual rights that it allegedly did not possess did not trigger duly to defend under same disparagement policy provision
• if agency is independent, diversity jurisdiction may exist if the conditions of 28 U.S.C. § 1332 are otherwise met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).