· 7/10/2000
Sturdevant v. Paulsen
Citations
- 218 F.3d 1160
- 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4215
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15846
- 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,140
- 2000 WL 943421
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to conclusively resolve the interplay between the Risk Management Fund and the state’s legal liability
- noting the “overlap” between the question of whether a judgment against an entity would be satisfied out of a state’s treasury and issues of the entity’s financial independence through receipt of state funding and any ability to issue bonds and levy taxes
- entity’s lack of taxing authority ultimately tipped the balance towards a finding of arm-of-the-state status
- “... a fundamental characteristic of a political subdivision [is] political control by some community other than the state as a whole.”
- “[T]he Board enjoys Eleventh Amendment immunity as an instrumentality or ‘arm’ of the State of Colorado.”
- “the inquiry . . . is whether [the entity] is more like a county or city than . . . like an arm of the state” (quotation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, Lucero, Ellison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.