Owens v. Rush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “inadvertent[]” addition of “not,” especially “in the context of the charge as a whole,” was “clearly harmless beyond a reason- able doubt”
• concluding that a district court abused no discretion in allowing rebuttal evidence that contradicted a statement that defendant made on cross-examination, even though the evidence did not rebut anything defendant had presented in her defense
• holding admissible manuals prepared by Department of Health and Human Services for the processing of Medicare claims
• admitting testimony that was offered to prove notice, not the truth of the matter asserted
• “‘The very nature of conspiracy frequently requires that the existence of an agreement be proved by inferences from the conduct of the alleged participants or from circumstantial evidence of a scheme.’”
• Medicare Carrier’s Manual and FI letter to provider properly admitted into evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).