Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that government investigation into alleged antitrust violations prompted duty to investigate
• holding that a party who itself referred to evidence outside the record cannot claim unfair surprise when the district court treats the motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment
• finding that congressional proceeding that explored some of plaintiffs allegations “should have aroused [plaintiffs] suspicions”
• noting that plaintiffs “mere allegation of due diligence without asserting what steps were taken” did not meet the Wood standard
• holding that government investigation into alleged antitrust violations prompted duty to investigate
• finding no unfair surprise where nonmovant filed its own affidavits in response

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).