District of Columbia· 9/25/2002
Artis v. Greenspan
Citations
- 223 F. Supp. 2d 149
- 2002 WL 31121319
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Failure to exhaust administrative remedies deprives a district court of subject matter jurisdiction.”
- “A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue, personal jurisdiction or subject- matter jurisdiction.
- “A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue, personal jurisdiction or subject- matter jurisdiction.
- “A court may consider material outside of the pleadings in ruling on a motion to dismiss for lack of venue, personal jurisdiction or subject[] matter jurisdiction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McManus v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2007-12-31· cited 130×
- Williams v. GEICO CORP.District of Columbia· 2011-06-20· cited 119×
- Artis v. BernankeD.C. Circuit· 2011-01-11· cited 110×
- Al-Owhali v. AshcroftDistrict of Columbia· 2003-08-29· cited 76×
- Douglas v. Chariots for HireDistrict of Columbia· 2013-01-24· cited 58×
- Smith v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia· 2008-03-10· cited 50×
- Carroll v. EnglandDistrict of Columbia· 2004-05-18· cited 50×
- Tower Labs., Ltd. v. Lush Cosmetics Ltd.D.C. Circuit· 2018-01-24· cited 44×
- Ellis-Smith v. Secretary of the ArmyDistrict of Columbia· 2011-06-22· cited 42×
- Taylor v. ShinsekiD.C. Circuit· 2014-01-31· cited 38×
- AGS International Services S.A. v. Newmont USA Ltd.District of Columbia· 2004-11-16· cited 34×
- Haley v. AstrueDistrict of Columbia· 2009-11-05· cited 30×
- Flynn v. Ohio Building Restoration, Inc.District of Columbia· 2003-05-02· cited 30×
- Abraham v. BurwellDistrict of Columbia· 2015-06-08· cited 28×
- Wada v. United States Secret ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 2007-11-13· cited 26×
- Harbury v. HaydenDistrict of Columbia· 2006-08-01· cited 26×
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2006-11-07· cited 25×
- Johnson v. Deloitte Services, LLPDistrict of Columbia· 2013-04-15· cited 24×
- Herbert v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2013-02-25· cited 21×
- Fletcher v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2007-03-26· cited 20×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1994-03-01· cited 1,980×
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 1,934×
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court· 1947-04-07· cited 1,339×
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncD.C. Circuit· 2000-06-27· cited 1,335×
- Josiah Haynesworth and Fred Hancock v. Frank P. Miller, Chief, Law Enforcement Section, Office of the Corporation Counsel, (Two Cases)D.C. Circuit· 1987-05-29· cited 367×
- Phoenix Consulting, Inc. v. Republic of AngolaD.C. Circuit· 2000-06-16· cited 314×
- Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, Adolph Kizas v. William H. WebsterD.C. Circuit· 1983-04-26· cited 267×
- Anand Prakash v. American UniversityD.C. Circuit· 1984-02-10· cited 220×
- Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & TechnologyTenth Circuit· 2002-03-13· cited 218×
- In re PapandreouD.C. Circuit· 1998-04-10· cited 151×
- Artis, Cynthia v. Greenspan, AlanD.C. Circuit· 1998-10-20· cited 75×
- Raeford D. WADE, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SECRETARY OF the ARMY, Etc., Defendant-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1986-08-14· cited 66×
- Leda Anderson, a Married Person v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the InteriorNinth Circuit· 2000-10-30· cited 41×
Other cases named Artis v. Greenspan
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.