Skip to main content
· 10/30/2000

Leda Anderson, a Married Person v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior

Citations

  • 230 F.3d 1158
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11523
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8673
  • 31 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20239
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27041
  • 2000 WL 1610341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • to be colorable, a claim must be supported by “facts sufficient to state a violation of substantive or procedural due process.” 24 (quoting Hoye v. Sullivan, 985 F.2d 990, 992 (9th Cir. 1992))
  • same for provision that “[n]o decision which at the time of its rendition is subject to [administrative] appeal . . . shall be considered final so as to be agency action subject to judicial review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Alarcon, McKeown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.