Anand Prakash v. American University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that summary judgment is a ruling on the merits of the case and bars any future action on res judicata grounds
• requiring that the intent to remain is for “an unspecified or indefinite period of time”
• noting that the evidence relevant to determine diversity jurisdiction “is that relating to the domiciles of the parties”
• noting that a Rule 12(b)(1) dismissal for lack of diverse citizenship does not have res judicata implications and does not preclude a litigant from refiling the action in an appropriate forum
• “As a decision on the merits, a summary judgment merges or bars the action for res judicata purposes.”
• “court has considerable latitude in devising the procedures it will follow to ferret out the facts pertinent to jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).