Skip to main content
· 11/5/2009

Haley v. Astrue

Citations

  • 667 F. Supp. 2d 138
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102847
  • 2009 WL 3673037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the fact that the District of Columbia was the location of plaintiffs EEO appeal irrelevant to Title VII’s venue inquiry
  • declining to “reach the merits of [the] defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim” in a Title VII action where “venue was improper” in the District of Columbia

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.