District of Columbia· 6/20/2011
Williams v. GEICO CORP.
Citations
- 792 F. Supp. 2d 58
- 79 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1493
- 24 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1707
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64746
- 2011 WL 2441306
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that venue was improper because the plaintiff did not refute a declaration accompanying a motion to dismiss
- explaining that venue in an ADA action is proper, among other places, where the alleged unlawful employment practice occurred
- “Delivering a summons and complaint to a corporate representative who is not an officer, a managing or general agent, or an agent authorized to accept service fails to satisfy the requirements of Rule 4(h)[(1)].”
- “Delivering a summons and complaint to a corporate representative who is not an officer, a managing or general agent, or an agent authorized to accept service fails to satisfy the requirements of Rule 4(h)[ (1) ].”
- “[W]hen [an] objection has been raised, the burden is on the plaintiff to establish that the district he chose is a proper venue.”
- “Deference to plaintiffs pro se status ... cannot justify the exercise of jurisdiction over defendants who have not been served properly.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John D. Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Douglas v. Chariots for HireDistrict of Columbia· 2013-01-24· cited 58×
- McCain v. Bank of AmericaD.C. Circuit· 2014-01-30· cited 58×
- Freedom Watch, Inc. v. Organization of the Petroleum Exporting CountriesD.C. Circuit· 2014-09-12· cited 46×
- Ananiev v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District of Columbia· 2013-09-12· cited 43×
- Lemon v. KramerDistrict of Columbia· 2017-09-11· cited 43×
- Ellis-Smith v. Secretary of the ArmyDistrict of Columbia· 2011-06-22· cited 42×
- Fam v. Bank of America NA (USA)District of Columbia· 2017-02-22· cited 39×
- Taylor v. ShinsekiD.C. Circuit· 2014-01-31· cited 38×
- Slaby v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2012-11-04· cited 36×
- Roland v. Branch Banking & Trust CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2015-12-14· cited 36×
- Freedman v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.District of Columbia· 2015-09-21· cited 30×
- Abraham v. BurwellDistrict of Columbia· 2015-06-08· cited 28×
- Johnson v. Deloitte Services, LLPDistrict of Columbia· 2013-04-15· cited 24×
- Herbert v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2013-02-25· cited 21×
- Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. v. BivinsDistrict of Columbia· 2014-02-19· cited 20×
- Gardner v. MabusDistrict of Columbia· 2014-06-20· cited 19×
- Dumitrescu v. Dyncorp International, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2017-06-30· cited 17×
- Battle v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-02-28· cited 13×
- Judd v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict of Columbia· 2011-07-01· cited 13×
- Associated Producers, Ltd. v. Vanderbilt UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2014-12-23· cited 12×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court· 2010-03-23· cited 1,364×
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,362×
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court· 1947-04-07· cited 1,339×
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-01-08· cited 924×
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorD.C. Circuit· 1983-11-29· cited 490×
- Cuthbert O. Simpkins v. District of Columbia GovernmentD.C. Circuit· 1997-03-14· cited 407×
- Friedman v. Estate of PresserSixth Circuit· 1991-04-11· cited 310×
- James Cameron v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney GeneralD.C. Circuit· 1993-01-22· cited 272×
- Cambridge Holdings Group, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceD.C. Circuit· 2007-06-19· cited 203×
- Ronald Del Raine v. Norman Carlson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of PrisonsSeventh Circuit· 1987-10-21· cited 175×
- Luise Light v. Isabel WolfD.C. Circuit· 1987-04-17· cited 166×
- Aetna Business Credit, Inc. v. Universal Decor & Interior Design, Inc., Gary L. Kemp and Sharon L. KempFifth Circuit· 1981-01-27· cited 161×
- Darby v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict of Columbia· 2002-11-04· cited 151×
- Artis v. GreenspanDistrict of Columbia· 2002-09-25· cited 114×
- Freeman v. FallinDistrict of Columbia· 2003-03-24· cited 107×
- Unnamed caseD.C. Circuit· 1969-10-27· cited 99×
- Robert Norlock v. City of GarlandFifth Circuit· 1985-08-15· cited 97×
- Day v. D.C. Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia· 2002-03-12· cited 97×
- James v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc.District of Columbia· 2002-07-31· cited 90×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.