Arthur D. Roebuck v. R. James Nicholson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \a claim is an application for entitlement to a VA benefit based on a current disability\
• holding that “a claim is an application for entitlement to a VA benefit based on a current disability”
• acknowledging that VA can bifurcate a claim and address different theories or arguments in separate decisions
• noting that the Board’s decision “was issued by the Board in two parts separated by less than a year”
• noting that the Board's decision \was issued by the Board in two parts separated by less than a year\
• noting that “although there may be multiple theories or means of establishing entitlement to a benefit for a disability, if the theories all pertain to the same benefit for the same disability, they constitute the same claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).