Bingham v. Nicholson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board’s failure to consider pre- sumptive eligibility in an earlier adjudication of a claim did not vitiate the finality of that earlier decision
• veteran seeking service connection for an ear condition on a direct basis and later on a presumptive basis, did not have two separate claims, but had two separate “theories” of a single claim for benefits
• separate theories are not separate claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).