· 8/8/2005
Kirkpatrick v. Nicholson
Citations
- 417 F.3d 1361
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16479
- 2005 WL 1863275
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a remand is not a “decision”
- rejecting the appellant's contention that the Board's failure to address his arguments in a remand order constituted an implicit denial that should be viewed as a decision for purposes of appeal to this Court
- \The Board's remand order does not address the issue of the Board's jurisdiction at all.\
- “Our case law and section 7104(d)(2) define a Board decision as including an order granting appropriate relief or denying relief.”
- “Our case law and section 7104(d)(2) define a Board decision as including an order granting appropriate relief or denying relief.”
- Board’s remand “for additional medical examinations” was not a “decision” because it did not grant or deny relief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lourie, Clevenger, Linn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.