Thomas G. Joyce, Claimant-Appellant v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the third condition not met because the claimant could raise, in a later-refiled appeal, “any objections to the judgment that was entered, whether the errors arose from the original [Veterans Court] decision or the second and final decision”
• “We have repeatedly made clear that a decision by the [Veterans Court] remanding to the Board is non-final and not reviewable.”
• “We have repeatedly made clear that a decision by the [Veterans Court] remanding to the Board is non-final and not reviewable.”
• “We have repeatedly made clear that a decision by the [Veterans Court] remanding to the Board is non-final and not reviewable.”
• “We have repeatedly made clear that a decision by the [Veterans Court] remanding to the Board is non-final and not reviewable.... [unless] the remand action itself would in dependently violate the rights of the veteran, for example, where a remand would be barred by statute.”
• in a decision addressing solely the third Williams condition, noting that “[t] he sole exception [to the finality rule] is where the remand action itself would independently violate the rights of the veteran, for example, where a remand would be barred by statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).