Skip to main content
· 3/11/2005

Durr v. Nicholson

Citations

  • 400 F.3d 1375
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4065
  • 2005 WL 563589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to allow Veterans’ Court to force, through its procedural rules, inclusion of an address in filings as a jurisdictional requirement.
  • stating a \background interpretive principle ... is that prose pleadings are to be liberally construed\
  • noting that pro se pleadings should be liberally construed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Clevenger, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.