John T. King v. Eric K. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “a manifest change in the outcome of the adjudication means that, absent the alleged clear and unmistakable error, the benefit sought would have been granted at the outset”
• emphasizing “that [CUE] is ‘a very specific and rare kind of error,’ and the burden of demonstrating [CUE] is an onerous one”
• specifically noting, in a CUE case where failure to develop evidence was the issue, that failure to sympathetically read the claim had not been alleged
• The breach of the duty to assist creates an \'incomplete rather than an incorrect record.'\
• discussing requirements to show CUE

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).