Joseph C. Hillyard v. Eric K. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an assertion of CUE is a motion or a request, not a theory of entitlement that can be considered part of another claim
• “The Court finds it important to clarify the use of the terms that appear in this decision and decisions cited herein in the hope that these definitions will bring some uniformity to the use of these terms in future adjudications and Court decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).