Seventh Circuit· 7/27/2011

Arobelidze v. Holder

Citations

653 F.3d 513
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15404
2011 WL 3132459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Because the rule [requiring immigration petitioners to exhaust all administrative remedies before seeking judicial review] is non-jurisdictional, it is subject to waiver, forfeiture, and other discretionary considerations.”
the obligation to exhaust administrative remedies \usually forecloses a petitioner from raising an issue in federal court that was not raised before the immigration tribunal.\
the obligation to exhaust admin‐ istrative remedies “usually forecloses a petitioner from raising an issue in federal court that was not raised before the immigration tribunal.”
“Because the rule [requiring immigration petitioners to exhaust all ad‐ ministrative remedies before seeking judicial review] is non‐ jurisdictional, it is subject to waiver, forfeiture, and other dis‐ cretionary considerations.”
illustrating the limited application of Chevron

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anh-Thu P. Mai-Windle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.