Arobelidze v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the rule [requiring immigration petitioners to exhaust all administrative remedies before seeking judicial review] is non-jurisdictional, it is subject to waiver, forfeiture, and other discretionary considerations.”
• the obligation to exhaust administrative remedies \usually forecloses a petitioner from raising an issue in federal court that was not raised before the immigration tribunal.\
• the obligation to exhaust admin‐ istrative remedies “usually forecloses a petitioner from raising an issue in federal court that was not raised before the immigration tribunal.”
• “Because the rule [requiring immigration petitioners to exhaust all ad‐ ministrative remedies before seeking judicial review] is non‐ jurisdictional, it is subject to waiver, forfeiture, and other dis‐ cretionary considerations.”
• illustrating the limited application of Chevron

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).