Ali Padash v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting 8 courts “must make every effort not to interpret the provision at issue in a manner that 9 renders other provisions of the same statute inconsistent”
• petitioner did not establish he would be recruited or singled out for persecution by the military on account of a protected ground
• \The legislative objective reflects Congress's intent that the [CSPA] be construed so as to provide expansive relief to children of United States citizens and permanent residents.\
• “[W]e must make every effort not to interpret the provision at issue in a manner that renders other provisions of the same statute inconsistent, meaningless or superfluous.” (internal quotation marks and adjustments omitted)
• “[W]e must make every effort not to interpret the provision at issue in a manner that renders other provisions of the same statute inconsistent, meaningless or superfluous.” (internal quotation marks and adjustments omitted)
• “We must make every effort not to interpret the provision at issue in a manner that renders other provisions of the same statute inconsistent . . . .” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).