Seventh Circuit· 8/24/2016
Maria Arias v. Loretta E. Lynch
Citations
- 834 F.3d 823
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15597
- 2016 WL 4468076
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “troubling results . . . would follow from a rule that every crime that involves any element of deception involves moral turpitude”
- instructing the BIA to determine the “appropriate legal framework for judging moral turpitude”
- “[W]e doubt that every violation of the statute necessarily qualifies as a crime involving moral turpitude.”
- “We and other courts have sometimes used broader language, writing that any crime involving the larger concept of ‘deception,’ in contrast to the narrower concept of fraud, involves moral turpitude.”
- “A rule that all crimes that involve any element of deception categorically involve moral turpitude would produce results at odds with the accepted definition of moral turpitude as conduct that is ‘inherently base, vile or depraved.’ ”
- de- fining malum prohibitum and malum in se
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Ripple, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Barbosa v. BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-03-28· cited 118×
- Flores-Molina v. SessionsTenth Circuit· 2017-03-07· cited 33×
- David Nunez-Vasquez v. William BarrFourth Circuit· 2020-07-13· cited 14×
- Pedro Aguirre Barbosa v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-03-28· cited 12×
- BAILEY v. STATE ex rel. BD. OF TESTS FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUG INFLUENCESupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2022-05-24· cited 10×
- Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Marion County ProsecutorSeventh Circuit· 2021-08-02· cited 8×
- Ruperto Hernandez Zarate v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2022-02-18· cited 8×
- Clemente Avelino Pereida v. William P. BarrEighth Circuit· 2019-03-01· cited 6×
- Eva Gonzalez Romo v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-08-14· cited 5×
- Munoz-Rivera v. RosenFifth Circuit· 2021-01-27· cited 5×
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael H. SaidSupreme Court of Iowa· 2021-01-08
- Baddourah v. BaddourahSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2021-03-10
- Baddourah v. McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2021-03-10
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 938×
- Marek PARTYKA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, RespondentThird Circuit· 2005-08-11· cited 149×
- SILVA-TREVINOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2015-07-01· cited 139×
- Jose Roberto Fernandez-Ruiz v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2006-11-15· cited 136×
- FLORESBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1980-07-01· cited 136×
- Octavia Beltran-Tirado,petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2000-05-31· cited 105×
- Hamdan v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceFifth Circuit· 1996-10-25· cited 97×
- AJAMIBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1999-07-01· cited 84×
- Blake v. CarboneSecond Circuit· 2007-06-01· cited 83×
- SOLONBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2007-07-01· cited 81×
- FUALAAUBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1996-07-01· cited 72×
- Ali v. MukaseySeventh Circuit· 2008-04-04· cited 70×
- Arobelidze v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2011-07-27· cited 67×
- Luis Fernando Padilla v. Alberto GonzalesSeventh Circuit· 2005-02-22· cited 63×
- Wei Cong Mei v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2004-12-29· cited 61×
- Joni Aggoubi Zaitona v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSixth Circuit· 1993-10-18· cited 57×
- Mlaith Abdelqadar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2005-07-01· cited 54×
- Ricardo Prudencio v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2012-01-30· cited 51×
- Juarez v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2010-03-12· cited 48×
- State v. MajorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.