Supreme Court· 6/8/1964
Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.
Citations
- 377 U.S. 476
- 84 S. Ct. 1526
- 12 L. Ed. 2d 457
- 1964 U.S. LEXIS 2381
- 141 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 681
- 1964 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he present statutory rule is that only ‘damages’ may be recovered.”
- adopting intent rule for patent infringement cases
- patent “dam- ages” tied to market valuation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brennan, White, Black, Douglas, Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
303 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 1,972×
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court· 2011-05-31· cited 600×
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 539×
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.S.D. New York· 1970-05-28· cited 503×
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 494×
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2009-09-11· cited 489×
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court· 2016-06-13· cited 467×
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Federal Circuit· 1995-06-15· cited 449×
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1978-04-25· cited 369×
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneFederal Circuit· 1990-10-23· cited 364×
- Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.First Circuit· 1994-09-15· cited 321×
- Commil United States, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc.Supreme Court· 2015-05-26· cited 277×
- Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedFederal Circuit· 1990-07-30· cited 261×
- Nalco Company v. Chem-Mod, LLCFederal Circuit· 2018-02-27· cited 242×
- Laserdynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-08-30· cited 231×
- Pall Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Micron Separations, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1995-10-24· cited 224×
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyFederal Circuit· 1983-12-27· cited 206×
- King Instrument Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Otari Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1985-06-26· cited 199×
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court· 1980-09-17· cited 198×
- Braun Inc. And Braun Aktiengesellschaft, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Dynamics Corporation of AmericaFederal Circuit· 1992-10-07· cited 198×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court· 1940-05-27· cited 2,271×
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1892-02-29· cited 1,398×
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court· 1964-04-06· cited 664×
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court· 1944-02-07· cited 490×
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court· 1964-04-20· cited 468×
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court· 1929-10-14· cited 407×
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 381×
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1917-04-09· cited 365×
- United States v. Loew's Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-11-05· cited 303×
- Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1931-03-09· cited 270×
- United States v. Univis Lens Co.Supreme Court· 1942-05-11· cited 227×
- Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1895-01-07· cited 149×
- Union Tool Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1922-05-15· cited 149×
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court· 1909-04-19· cited 135×
- De Forest Radio Telephone Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-02-21· cited 135×
- Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court· 1884-12-08· cited 126×
- Mercoid Corp. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court· 1944-01-03· cited 118×
- Duplate Corp. v. Triplex Safety Glass Co.Supreme Court· 1936-05-18· cited 84×
- General Talking Pictures Corp. v. Western Electric Co.Supreme Court· 1939-01-03· cited 77×
- Sontag Chain Stores Co. v. National Nut Co. of Cal.Supreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 75×
Other cases named Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.
7 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 381×
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court· 1960-02-29· cited 23×
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court· 1963-04-01· cited 2×
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 1×
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.D. Massachusetts· 1965-03-11
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court· 1960-10-10
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court· 1963-10-14
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.