Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that no reduction can be allowed where the alleged infringer’s similar devices are infringing rather than strict substitutes
• establishing elements patentee is required to show for an award of lost profits
• establishing elements patentee is required to show for an award of lost profits
• \The right to damages caused by price reduction stands on the same ground as that to damages caused by lost sales.\
• “[a] product lacking the advantages of that patented can hardly be termed a substitute ‘acceptable’ to the customer who wants those advantages”
• “A product lacking the advantages of that patented can hardly be termed a substitute ‘acceptable’ to the customer who wants those advantages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).