Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state unfair competition statutes may not be used to secure injunctive monopolies in conflict with exclusive federal patent authority
• holding that state unfair competition statutes may not be used to secure injunctive monopolies in conflict with exclusive federal patent authority
• holding that a State’s unfair competition law cannot protect against the copying of items placed in the public domain by federal patent and copyright law
• holding that a state may not, through a common-law damage claim for unfair competition, enforce a state standard \that clashes with the objectives of the federal patent laws\
• holding that state law claim for unfair competition cannot be applied to “give protection of a kind that clashes with the objectives of the federal patent laws”
• holding that a state may not, through a common-law damage claim for unfair competition, enforce a state standard \that clashes with the objectives of the federal patent laws\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).