Braun Inc. And Braun Aktiengesellschaft, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Dynamics Corporation of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \the jury's finding of infringement must be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence\
• finding that a mark did not acquire 26 secondary meaning in 18 months
• “[W]hile not impossible, it is difficult for a product to acquire secondary meaning during an 18–month period.”
• “[L]arge consumer demand for Braun’s blender does not permit a finding the public necessarily associated the blender design with Braun.”
• “[L]arge consumer demand for Braun’s blender does not permit a finding the public necessarily associated the blender design with Braun.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).