Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 5/15/1922

Union Tool Co. v. Wilson

Citations

  • 259 U.S. 107
  • 42 S. Ct. 427
  • 66 L. Ed. 848
  • 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “legal discretion in [a civil contempt proceeding] does not extend to a refusal to apply well-settled principles of law”
  • “[L]egal discretion in [a civil contempt proceeding] does not extend to a refusal to apply well-settled principles of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brandeis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.