Supreme Court· 5/15/1922
Union Tool Co. v. Wilson
Citations
- 259 U.S. 107
- 42 S. Ct. 427
- 66 L. Ed. 848
- 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2464
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “legal discretion in [a civil contempt proceeding] does not extend to a refusal to apply well-settled principles of law”
- “[L]egal discretion in [a civil contempt proceeding] does not extend to a refusal to apply well-settled principles of law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brandeis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.