Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. Disimone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a specific intent to induce infringement cannot exist where defendants had no prior awareness of patent
• holding that knowledge or belief held by corporation’s officers as imputable to corporation
• noting that Manville did not notify sales personnel or begin sales campaign to market invention
• finding experimental use with one memorandum of intent to experiment, but no records of testing
• stating that to induce infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b
• finding summary judgment for officers of the defendant appropriate because there was no evidence or findings that any of the officers had the requisite intent and noting the existence of “good faith belief’ based on existence of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).