Laserdynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that settlement licenses may be considered in “proper context within the hypothetical negotiation framework”
• holding that the district court erred in permitting the jury to hear an expert’s damages testimony concerning a royalty rate derived from irrelevant inputs
• determining that a laptop could not form the royalty base, when an optical disc drive within the laptop infringed
• explaining that entire market value rule is derived from Garretson v. Clark, 111 U.S. 120, 121 (1884
• finding that the plaintiff “failed to present evidence showing that the patented disc discrimination method drove demand for the laptop computers”
• stating that the lack of quantitative support would “alone 25 justify” excluding the expert’s opinions at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Summit 6, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-09-21· cited 236×
• Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2014-12-04· cited 231×
• Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2014-04-25· cited 213×
• Virnetx, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2014-09-16· cited 196×
• Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2018-01-10· cited 154×
• Mentor Graphics Corporation v. Eve-Usa, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-03-16· cited 110×
• In re Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2016-03-08· cited 90×
• Astrazeneca Ab v. Apotex Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-04-07· cited 82×
• Versata Software, Inc. v. Sap America, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-05-01· cited 77×
• FTC v. Qualcomm Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-08-11· cited 77×
• Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-12-03· cited 71×
• Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int'l, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2018-07-03· cited 60×
• Aqua Shield v. Interpool Pool Cover Team
  Federal Circuit· 2014-12-22· cited 45×
• Elbit Systems Land and C4i Ltd v. Hughes Network Systems, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2019-06-25· cited 36×
• Prism Technologies LLC v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-03-06· cited 35×
• Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Mobility
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-07-30· cited 31×
• H-W Technology, L.C. v. overstock.com, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2014-07-11· cited 29×
• Adasa Inc. v. Avery Dennison Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2022-12-16· cited 27×
• Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
  Federal Circuit· 2015-08-10· cited 26×
• Omega Patents, LLC v. Calamp Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2021-09-14· cited 26×

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1993-08-09· cited 751×
• United States v. Calverley
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-10-20· cited 705×
• Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.
  Supreme Court· 2011-05-31· cited 600×
• Ortiz v. Jordan
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-24· cited 549×
• Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1970-05-28· cited 503×
• Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-09-11· cited 489×
• Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.
  Federal Circuit· 1995-06-15· cited 449×
• Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 418×
• I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-03-10· cited 374×
• Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1978-04-25· cited 369×
• E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1985-08-21· cited 253×
• Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corporation, Visa International Service Association, Inc., Visa Usa, Inc. And Crestar Bank, Inc., Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1999-08-27· cited 245×
• Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2011-01-04· cited 236×
• BMC Resources, Inc. v. Paymentech, L.P.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-09-20· cited 203×
• State Industries, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Mor-Flo Industries, Inc. And American Appliance Mfg. Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 1989-11-09· cited 180×
• ResQNet. Com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-02-05· cited 158×
• Alden W. Hanson v. Alpine Valley Ski Area, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1983-10-06· cited 143×
• Twm Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellants v. Dura Corp. And Kidde, Inc., Appellants/cross-Appellees
  Federal Circuit· 1986-04-25· cited 138×
• Cambridge Toxicology Group, Inc. v. Exnicios
  Fifth Circuit· 2007-08-01· cited 128×