Laserdynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that settlement licenses may be considered in “proper context within the hypothetical negotiation framework”
• holding that the district court erred in permitting the jury to hear an expert’s damages testimony concerning a royalty rate derived from irrelevant inputs
• determining that a laptop could not form the royalty base, when an optical disc drive within the laptop infringed
• explaining that entire market value rule is derived from Garretson v. Clark, 111 U.S. 120, 121 (1884
• finding that the plaintiff “failed to present evidence showing that the patented disc discrimination method drove demand for the laptop computers”
• stating that the lack of quantitative support would “alone 25 justify” excluding the expert’s opinions at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).