Skip to main content

Arnold v. State

Citations

  • 853 S.W.2d 543
  • 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 77
  • 1993 WL 99895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a \applies to criminal cases absent 'any explicit or implicit legislative intent indicating otherwise.'\
  • holding that Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a \applies to criminal cases absent 'any explicit or implicit legislative intent indicating otherwise.'\
  • holding that rule 18a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, relating to disqualification and recusal of judges, applies in criminal cases
  • holding that the civil procedure rules on the recusal or disqualification of judges applies in criminal cases
  • holding that 10-day notice provision for motion to recuse in Rule 18a explicitly apply to criminal cases
  • holding that “Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a applies to criminal cases absent ‘any explicit or implicit legislative intent indicating otherwise’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Overstreet, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

174 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Arnold v. State

337 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.