Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/29/2008

Luna v. State

Citations

268 S.W.3d 594
2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1672
2008 WL 4724087

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an untimely objection, made after the question was asked and answered, did not preserve error
holding that, because search of apartment was supported by owner’s valid consent, trial court did not err in denying appellant overnight guest’s motion to suppress evidence obtained as result of warrantless search
noting that, for Randolph to apply, there must be evidence presented that defendant \was both physically present [at the residence] and expressly refused consent\
noting that an overnight guest has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his host‘s house
holding untimely objection, which was made after the question was asked and answered, did not preserve error for appeal
noting that, for Randolph to apply, there must be evidence presented that defendant “was both physically present [at the residence] and expressly refused consent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Hervey, Womack, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

216 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Luna v. State

40 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.