Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 4/4/1960

Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.

Citations

  • 361 U.S. 388
  • 80 S. Ct. 453
  • 4 L. Ed. 2d 393
  • 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that employer bears burden of proof, on each and every element of the claimed exemption
  • holding that employer bears burden of proof, on each and every element of the claimed exemption
  • holding that employer bears burden of proof, on each and every element of the claimed exemption
  • noting that the FLSA’s “exemptions are to be narrowly construed against the employers seeking to assert them and their application limited to those establishments plainly and unmistakably within their terms and spirit”
  • providing that “exemptions [from FLSA coverage] are to be narrowly construed against the employers”
  • emphasizing limited application to be given an exemption from the FLSA provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Whittaker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

499 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.