Skip to main content
· 12/13/1990

Edward W. Dalheim v. Kdfw-Tv

Citations

  • 918 F.2d 1220
  • 18 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1657
  • 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 113
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21479
  • 1990 WL 182180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the ultimate determination of whether an employee is exempt [is] properly characterized as a conclusion of law,” even though “based on both historical fact and factual inferences”
  • applying analysis to TV producers: “Section 541.205(a) is not concerned with distinguishing between white collar and blue collar employees, or between service industries and manufacturing industries.”
  • television newscast producers, station directors and assignment reporters are non-exempt employees because their primary work duties are related to production aspect of television station's business
  • \that a worker's poor performance may have a significant profit-and-loss impact is not enough to make that worker an exempt administrator\
  • “that a worker’s poor performance may have a significant profit-and-loss impact is not enough to make that worker an exempt administrator”
  • television newscast producers, station directors and assignment reporters are non-exempt employees because their primary work duties are related to production aspect of television station’s business

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rubin, Garwood, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.