Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that § 203(o) \provides that the compensability of time spent changing clothes . . . is a subject appropriately committed to collective bargaining\
• noting that § 203(o) \provides that the compensability of time spent changing clothes . . . is a subject appropriately committed to collective bargaining\
• holding the narrow-construction principle inapplicable to a definitions provision regarding doffing clothing because narrowly construed exemptions “generally reside in § 213, which is entitled ‘Exemptions’ and classifies certain kinds of workers as uncovered by various provisions”
• holding the narrow-construction principle inapplicable to a definitions provision regarding doffing clothing because narrowly construed exemptions “generally reside in § 213, which is entitled ‘Exemptions’ and classifies certain kinds of workers as uncovered by various provisions”
• interpreting a statutory term “as taking [its] ... common meaning” from “the era of [the statute’s] enactment” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• consulting “[dictionaries from the era of [statutory provision’s] enactment” to espy ordinary meaning of undefined term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).