National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. George P. Shultz, Secretary, U. S. Department of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding letter from Administrator of Wage and Hour Division of Department of Labor interpreting provision of Fair Labor Standards Act was final agency action
• holding letter from Administrator of Wage and Hour Division of Department of Labor interpreting provision of Fair Labor Standards Act was final agency action
• holding letter from Administrator of Wage and Hour Division of Department of Labor interpreting provision of Fair Labor Standards Act was final agency action
• holding that an opinion letter by the administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor interpreting the Fair Labor Standards Act was final agency action in part because it would be \entitled to deference as a matter of law from a court reviewing the question\
• reasoning that “with the authoritative interpretative ruling by the [agency head,] the agency’s interpretative action has come to an end, and there is no fair basis for saying this process will be disrupted by judicial review”
• noting that for finality, an interpretation should not be subject to reconsideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).